Uncle Joe Biden's Stalinist Raid of Giuliani and the Likely Future Arrest of his Opponent Trump

Without arguing their creative legal theory in a court case with due process, adversarial arguments, and cross examination, the Biden administration was once again able to confiscate the legal documents, which are supposed to be protected by attorney-client privilege, of his chief opponent Trump. All he needed was a corrupt, partisan judge like Kimba Wood. Wood made it possible confiscate the privileged documents of Trump's previous lawyer Michael Cohen with nothing but the creative legal theory of a campaign finance violation that was never argued in a real court case. This was after the partisan "judge" officiated George Soros' wedding.

This time, the Biden administration's creative legal theory is that because Rudolph Giuliani advised Trump to remove Marie Yovanovitch from her position as ambassador to the Ukraine, he was lobbying for Ukrainians who wanted her out, and that makes him a foreign lobbyist. Therefore, they can go after him for violating FARA, not registering as a foreign lobbyist, a law the government didn’t enforce in the past. Before the Mueller coup, the government would send foreign lobbyists who didn't register a letter reminding them to register, so many in DC didn’t bother registering. It is clear that Weissmann thought he was shooting at fish in the DC barrel when he targeted people who worked for the Trump campaign for not registering as foreign lobbyists for work they did BEFORE they even worked for the Trump campaign. However, Mueller's partisan team lost every case that went to court when his victim refused to sign a coerced plea deal. This includes the case against General Flynn’s partner, Bijan Kian, which the appeals court judge threw out due to lack of evidence.

What Giuliani needs to show the public is that while he was investigating Hunter Biden’s company Burisma, he found that Marie Yovanovitch was not the deified angel the Democratic Party and their biased media made her out to be during their partisan impeachment. He needs to show that she was protecting Hunter Biden and Burisma, and her loyalties were with the Obama/Biden administration.

Giuliani should show that he was working for his client, not Ukraine, when in his investigation was getting information from Ukrainians who wanted Yovanovitch out.

Like FARA, the Logan Act is a law that was not enforced in DC. The Logan Act is a likely unconstitutional law from the 18th Century that hasn't been used since the mid 19th Century and was unsuccessfully prosecuted only twice. Next thing you know, Biden will pulling the Logan Act out of his ass, dusting it off, and using it to go after his political opponents like he's doing with FARA. Oh... that's right... he already did that with the Logan Act, according to Strzok's declassified notes. I think it's clear that the partisan prosecutors in New York's Eighth District, many of whom made their bones taking down the five families of La Cosa Nostra, are using Trump's confiscated data and their own creative legal theories to come up with a fake RICO case against the Trump organization. It seems the Democratic Party wants to take their chief rival Trump as a political prisoner before the next presidential election. The irony would be incredible since it was Rudy Giuliani who pioneered the use of RICO against the five families. Adding to the irony, the excuse used by the Democrats of the Eighth District for opening their case against Trump is because the debunked Steele dossier included the false story that Michael Cohen met with Russians in Prague. This empowered Weissmann; his team of laughably partisan Democratic legal goons; and their corrupt, doddering, never-Trump, RINO figurehead Mueller to "investigate" the false story and then use their creative theory of a campaign finance violation involving Michael Cohen to hand the case to the New York's partisan Eighth District. This is amazing hypocrisy because the same party that supported Bill Clinton's multiple felonies of perjury and suborning of perjury to cover up his abusive but consensual affair with a young subordinate in the White House while he was president were now raiding Trump's lawyer's home and office because they had a creative legal theory that Trump and Cohen committed a crime to cover up Trump's alleged consensual sex over a decade before he entered the White House. During Bill Clinton's impeachment and for the next two decades, Democrats and their partisan media claimed it was okay for Clinton to commit multiple felonies to cover up consensual sex. Now they were justifying raiding Trump's lawyer and dismissing Trump's right to attorney/client privilege because of their theory that Trump and Cohen committed a crime to cover up consensual sex. Their creative legal theory is self-serving and dubious, however, because Trump had good reason to keep his alleged affair secret regardless of the campaign, and money spent for good reason despite the campaign is considered personal funds, not campaign cash, even if it benefits the campaign. This was proven when the government attempted the same theory against John Edwards who spent money during 2004 campaign to cover up his affair. The FEC ruled the money was not campaign funds and though the judge ignored this ruling, the trial resulted in exoneration on one count a hung jury on five counts. Realizing they had no case, the government dropped their case against Edwards. However, this time the Democratic Prosecutors never argued their hypocritical creative legal theory about Trump's campaign finance violation in a court case. Instead when they raided Michael Cohen's home and office, they found proof that he and his wife committed tax fraud with his taxi company that had nothing to do with Trump. They bundled Cohen's real tax fraud with their theory of a campaign finance violation and gave Cohen a choice. They would attempt to overcharge him for tax fraud like they attempted with Paul Manafort who at the time they were torturing with solitary confinement and for whom they were changing the laws in New York in an attempt to nail him with double jeopardy in state court to prevent a possible future presidential pardon. On the other hand, Cohen could spend only three years in a minimum security prison, and they'd leave his wife alone if he would just plea guilty to the bundled plea deal and give them dirt on Trump. It didn't matter if the dirt was true or not because it didn't have to be verified as we saw with Cohen's congressional hearing. Cohen took the deal, and knowing full well that he was a political prisoner of the Democratic Party, as his chief lawyer he didn't hire a specialist in tax law, campaign finance law, or plea bargaining--he hired Bill and Hillary Clinton's lawyer who specializes in Democratic Party politics, Lanny Davis. Ironically, Lanny Davis argued publicly in the 1990s that it was fine for Bill Clinton to commit multiple felonies to coverup his consensual affair with a very young woman over whom he had enormous power. So THREE of Trump's personal lawyers have been raided by Biden's corrupt FBI. The Democratic Party has exaggerated and used the Capitol riot to investigate rightwing groups and imprison their members without bail, seeming to violate the Eighth Amendment, as they militarized DC. Does anyone believe they are not planning on indicting President Trump with one of their creative legal theories?